The study indicated that the connection involving the linear combinations off the 2 groups of parameters you’ll ideal feel explained by the one sort out a good Rc worth of
On the PSPP, four affairs emerged, recognized as actual notice-value, sporting events ability, physical condition, physical fuel, and you may glamorous human body having eigenvalues of just one.78, 4.34, step 3.59, step 3.46, and you can six.08 correspondingly accounting having 64% of difference among the activities. Compared with this new recommended hierarchical design (Fox Corbin, 1989), not, new bodily care about-worth level and also the glamorous system subscale presented big basis convergence and you will was after that removed off subsequent investigation. So it basis overlap between the glamorous looks and you may bodily mind-well worth bills might have been reported app iphone incontri uniforme elsewhere (Sonstroem ainsi que al., 1992). The remaining about three subscales from actual worry about-attitudes taken into account 38% of your own version about questionnaire things. Cronbach (1951) alphas of these subscales was .ninety to have activities competence (six points), .86 to own health (6 points), and you will .85 to have actual energy (six items).
The brand new POSQ and exhibited an obvious factor framework to own interpretation. Two items emerged with eigenvalues higher than step 1.00 and was basically identified as activity (6 products) and ego positioning (six things) having do so, bookkeeping for 34% and 21% of one’s difference within the participants’ solutions, correspondingly. The brand new interfactor relationship was negligible (r = .04), in line with past search (Benefits Roberts, 1994; Roberts Benefits 1995) confirming orthogonality of these two items. Alpha coefficients was in fact .71 and .ninety for the task and you can ego positioning to possess take action subscales, correspondingly.
To have a look at new multivariate relationships involving the linear combination of these two sets of details consisting of real worry about-perceptions/mission orientations having do it, and you can indices out of inherent motivation getting do it, canonical relationship try did
The IMI and additionally showed a steady grounds build given that all the points stacked to their particular circumstances appointment minimal expectations to get retained getting interpretation. Eigenvalues was indeed higher than 1.00 toward notice/thrills (5 activities), detected competence (4 issues), effort/pros (5 items), and you can stress/tension (4 items) inherent inspiration subscales, correspondingly, bookkeeping getting sixty.1% of your variance regarding points. Internal accuracy coefficients were .82 (interest/enjoyment), .77 (thought of skills), .76 (effort/ importance), and you can .77 (tension/ pressure) towards inherent motivation for do it subscales.
Means and standard deviations of your own actual mind-feeling (PSPP), activity and you may ego orientations having do it (POSQ), and you may built-in determination to own do it (IMI) subscales are shown in Desk step 1. Tall zero purchase correlations (2-tailed) have been observed ranging from activity positioning to possess do so and you may each other desire/pleasure (r .29), and energy/benefits (roentgen = .36). Self-thinking out-of shape had been associated so you can focus/enjoyment (r = .49), identified competence (r .59), effort/importance (roentgen = .49), and you may stress/tension (roentgen = -.27).
This new predictor parameters were comprising notice-attitudes regarding recreations ability, health, and you can physical energy, and activity and you may pride orientations to own take action. This new standards parameters contained the new four strategies from intrinsic motivation to have get it done, especially, interest/exhilaration, imagined competence, effort/benefits, and you will stress/pressure.
74, F(4, 252) = ,p <.0001). Follow-up canonical correlation analysis indicated three significant functions emerged. However, only the first function exceeded the .30 criterion (10% of the variance) suggested as the minimal level for meaningful interpretation (Tabachnick Fidell, 1989). 68 ([R.sup.2]= .46). A minimal canonical loading of .30 is considered to contribute significantly to the multivariate relationship (Pedhazur, 1982). As Table 2 demonstrates, a high positive loading on physical condition, and moderately positive loadings on task orientation for exercise, sports competence, and physical strength, were positively associated to the criterion set of variables composed of interest/ enjoyment, perceived competence, and effort/importance, and were negatively relat ed to tension/pressure for exercise. Ego orientation for exercise, however, failed to significantly contribute to the multivariate relationship. The redundancy index revealed that 16% of the variance in the four indices of intrinsic motivation for exercise could be explained by the linear combination of the predictor variables. A redundancy value of 10% is recommended as a significant and meaningful cutoff for interpretation (Pedhazur, 1982).